Belgian court has ruled against the Government, imposing a hefty fine of six million euros ($6.62 million) for the improper usage of Brussels Airport’s Runway 01.
The ruling comes in response to approximately 1,400 residents’ complaints about significant noise disturbances during landings, affecting communities in Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, Kraainem, Sterrebeek, and Wezembeek-Oppem.
The residents, facing noise levels of up to 80 decibels when the runway is in use, successfully argued that the Belgian Government violated wind regulations governing the runway’s usage.
According to these rules, Runway 01 should only be operational under specific weather conditions. However, it has been utilized more frequently than allowed, prompting the court’s decision.
The six million euro fine will be awarded as damages to affected residents, providing a semblance of justice for those enduring the constant disruptions.
Additionally, the Government will face daily fines of 20,000 euros ($22,095) until corrective measures are taken.
The heart of the issue lies in the runway, which, intended for specific weather conditions, reportedly accommodates between 200 to 300 landings per day.
This excessive usage results in noise levels far surpassing the acceptable limits, reaching up to 80 decibels, akin to facing an overflight every four minutes. The relentless noise pollution has left residents in perpetual discomfort and frustration.
Earlier this year, the mayors of four municipalities near the airport attempted to address the issue by seeking a change in the usage of Runway 01.
Despite their efforts, they acknowledged that the matter falls under the jurisdiction of the Federal Government, leaving them powerless to effect change directly.
In an attempt to garner attention, the mayors penned letters to Belgian Deputy Prime Minister and Transport Minister Georges Gilkinet but claimed their pleas went unanswered.
Minister Gilkinet proposed a night flight curfew at the airport in response to the escalating concerns in July. The proposed curfew would prohibit operations between 23:00 and 06:00, aiming to alleviate the impact on residents during nighttime.
However, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) voiced its opposition to the proposal, arguing that such restrictions would have unprecedented negative consequences on employment, connectivity, exports, and the overall economy in Belgium.
The IATA, advocating for a ‘Balanced Approach’ to addressing noise pollution, posits that operating restrictions, including night curfews, should be considered as a last resort due to their potential adverse economic impact.
The association warns against hastily implementing measures that could jeopardize employment and economic prosperity.
As the Belgian Government grapples with the fallout from the court ruling, the delicate balance between addressing the legitimate concerns of affected residents and safeguarding the economic interests of the aviation industry remains a pressing challenge.
The controversy underscores the need for a comprehensive and collaborative solution that prioritizes public well-being and economic sustainability in aviation regulation.
This article was created using automation technology and was thoroughly edited and fact-checked by one of our editorial staff members
