In a troubling development for public health, Belgian drinking water has been found to contain traces of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), a persistent chemical linked to potential fertility and child development issues.
The discovery, revealed in a recent investigation by the Belgian NGO Nature & Progrès, raises significant concerns about the safety of tap water in Belgium, particularly in the Brussels region where TFA concentrations are regularly monitored.
The revelation follows previous controversies surrounding per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly referred to as “forever chemicals,” which have sparked widespread outrage due to their persistent nature and potential health risks.
While PFAS contamination has been under scrutiny, TFA—another man-made pollutant—has largely escaped attention until now. With high levels of TFA recorded in Brussels water samples, the debate surrounding water safety is expected to reignite.
Health Risks and Data Deficiency
Virginie Pissoort, the head of advocacy at Nature & Progrès, expressed serious concerns about the implications of TFA contamination. “Our findings raise important questions regarding water safety, especially when considering the combination with other PFAS,” she stated.
Pissoort highlighted the lack of comprehensive data on TFA’s health effects, noting that while its toxicity is known to include liver damage and birth malformations, the current understanding is based on limited research.
Surprisingly, TFA’s presence in tap water is not a recent phenomenon; however, European public health authorities have largely overlooked it. In fact, some have erroneously classified TFA as harmless.
“Based on our analysis, the levels observed could mean that risks associated with TFA are currently being underestimated,” Pissoort added.
The NGO’s investigation revealed that TFA was detected in 34 out of 36 European tap water samples, with concentrations ranging from non-detectable levels (below 20 nanograms per liter, ng/L) to a striking 4,100 ng/L.
Specifically, Belgian samples showed concentrations of 1,100 ng/L and 320 ng/L, underscoring the need for closer monitoring and transparency in reporting.
Anonymity in Research and Its Implications
To avoid misinterpretation of their findings, the researchers anonymized the sampling locations.
This approach was intended to prevent the misrepresentation of any single region as being more problematic than others, as variations can stem from factors like water supply, distribution networks, and sampling times.
Pissoort cautioned against making “binary and definite statements,” emphasizing the need for a balanced discourse as Belgium prepares for potential changes in government.
Despite the alarming nature of the findings, public access to data regarding TFA levels in Belgian drinking water remains limited.
Currently, only Brussels water provider Vivaqua monitors TFA concentrations monthly, detecting levels that fluctuate between 500 and 1,500 ng/L. Unfortunately, this data is not made publicly available alongside other water quality analyses.
Previous reports have highlighted concerning levels of TFA in waterways throughout Wallonia, prompting government actions to map distribution points and improve water safety.
Unlike Denmark and Germany, which have established limits for TFA in drinking water, Belgium currently lacks regulatory thresholds, although discussions surrounding the revision of the directive on water intended for human consumption are ongoing.
Future Regulations and Public Health
From January 2026, a regulatory limit of 500 ng/L for total PFAS—including TFA—will be implemented in Belgium, but the urgency of addressing this issue is heightened by the increasing sales of PFAS pesticides.
Environmental organizations are calling for decisive action to curb chemical pollution at its source, advocating for a ban on PFAS pesticides and fluorinated gases.
Pissoort emphasized that while bottled water is often perceived as a safer alternative, it does not guarantee the absence of contamination.
The removal of TFA from water is challenging, as standard filtration methods, such as carbon filters, are ineffective. Only reverse osmosis has been identified as a viable solution, though it comes with significant costs.
A Balanced Perspective
Despite the unsettling findings, experts urge the public to remain calm. Research from the Dutch National Institute of Public Health and the Environment suggests that TFA levels of up to 2,200 ng/L in drinking water could be acceptable.
Notably, many contamination levels remain below this threshold, indicating that while vigilance is necessary, widespread panic may not be warranted.
As the conversation about chemical pollution intensifies, public advocacy plays a critical role in prompting policymakers to take action.
Organizations like Nature & Progrès are urging citizens to pressure decision-makers to prioritize environmental health, as the cumulative effects of various pollutants continue to pose significant risks to public well-being.
Conclusion
The recent discovery of TFA in Belgian drinking water underscores the importance of transparency in water quality monitoring and the need for comprehensive regulatory frameworks to protect public health.
As the scientific community and advocacy organizations call for action, it remains crucial for consumers to stay informed about the safety of their drinking water and to engage in discussions that can lead to meaningful changes in environmental policies.
The future of water safety in Belgium may depend on the collective efforts of both policymakers and the public to address the looming challenges posed by chemical contamination.
This article was created using automation technology and was thoroughly edited and fact-checked by one of our editorial staff members
, a persistent chemical linked to potential fertility and child development issues){kind=link}